Monday, August 09, 2004

Novak to Jail?

  • Tigers
  • Oregonian
  • NY Times
  • NY Times Navigator
  • Wash. Independent
  • Salon Magazine
  • Josh Marshall's TPM
  • The Progressive
  • Huffington Post
  • The Nation
  • Alternet
  • CommonDreams
  • Grist Magazine
  • CFAP
  • Commercial Appeal
  • Media Matters
  • Working for Change
  • Submit Democrat Ideas
  • Choose the Blue
  • History News Network
  • Matthew Iglesias
  • Bill Moyers
  • loaded Orygun
  • Blue Oregon
  • Digby
  • Carpetbagger Report
  • Chris Mooney
  • Science Progress
  • Think Progress
  • David Sirota
  • Liberal Oasis
  • The Daily Howler
  • Catphile (Matt R.)
  • David Corn's Bush Lies
  • Eric Alterman
  • Ezra Klein
  • Joe Conason
  • Daily Kos
  • Political Animal
  • Kevin Drum
  • Eschaton
  • 538 - Nate Silver
  • MyDD
  • Congress Matters
  • Greg Sargent's The Plum Line
  • Pharyngula
  • Science Blogs
  • SkepChick
  • Expelled Exposed
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • Greg Palast
  • Talk Left
  • Juan Cole
  • ESPN
  • CBS Sportsline
  • CNNSI
  • NBA
  • Basketball Prospectus
  • Fox Sports
  • The Sporting News
  • Go Tigers
  • Memphis Roar
  • Memphis Rivals
  • Griz
  • Blazer's Edge
  • Beyond Bowie

  • Weather Forecasts | Weather Maps | Weather Radar
  • The Boondocks
  • Doonesbury
  • This Modern World
  • The Onion
  • Dubyaspeak.com
  • Fark
  • Portland Movie Listings
  • Portland Music Listings
  • Concert Listings
  • Multnomah County Library
  • Tri Met
  • Craig's List (Portland, OR)
  • Air America
  • Democracy Now
  • Thom Hartmann
  • Radio Left
  • Small Bear Electronics
  • Guitar Gadgets
  • Harmony Central
  • VBA TUTOR
  • Mouser Electronics
  • You know, I’m ordinarily not a big fan of reporters going to jail for refusing to divulge their sources. Protection from disclosure is a fundamental ethical safeguard that in the long run allows journalists to effectively fulfill their role as watchdogs. This role is vital to the functioning of our democracy that is too often disregarded these days. But usually the journalists are protecting whistleblowers trying to expose some wrongdoing on the part of someone else—either the government or corporation or people within those institutions. But that’s not what’s going on here. This is apparently a case of two officials in the White House who were willing to sacrifice national security, worldwide nuclear anti-proliferation efforts, and the lives and careers of the people involved in order to settle a petty political score, perhaps committing felonies to do it. Isn’t there an ethical distinction one can make here?

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    << Home